The under-16s social media ban proves that governments can ban things… when they want
With the under-16s social media ban set to take effect on December 10, it’s a reminder that political will is the real currency of government action. When governments want to ban something, they absolutely can. They move fast and bring in laws that protect the Australian public.
This comes with threats of “punishment“ by lobby groups representing tech companies, who say the ban is unfairly targeting US tech companies. Social media platforms covered by the ban, including Meta, TikTok, X, YouTube, and Reddit, have refused to sign a pledge affirming their compliance.
The Australian government moved decisively to introduce the ban and keep under-16s off social media. So why can’t it stand up to the foreign-owned multinational companies that are paying $0 in tax, exploiting our national resources and driving endangered species to extinction?
If our leaders can stand up to digital media platforms, then they could also tackle monopolies, tighten environmental laws, ban the opening of new coal mines and regulate gas exports.
The social media ban isn’t just about apps. It’s a spotlight on what government could do if it prioritised people over politics.


