Hello and welcome back to parliament where it is the House sitting and also the first week of estimates. We will of course be concentrating a lot on that, as well as answering your questions – MPs and senators read this blog, so send through questions you would want asked in senate estimate committees and we’ll let them know they are there – but the main event for the next couple of days is the response to the visit from Israeli president, Isaac Herzog.
Now readers and friends of this blog need don’t need a lot of context for why this visit is launching mass protests across the country (with some of the biggest events planned for this afternoon). Herzog is the ceremonial head of state for Israel (much like our governor-general) and has not had control over Israeli policy, in terms of he doesn’t direct it. But he has spoken of his support for it, has been filmed signing bombs which have been dropped on civilian populations in Gaza and a UN Commission of Inquiry last year named Herzog as one of the senior Israeli politicians and figures who had incited “the commission of genocide”. One of the reasons for that is his quote from October 2023 that the entire nation of Palestine was responsible for October 7.
The quote mentioned in the UN commission of inquiry is:
On 13 October 2023, President Isaac Herzog stated, “it’s an entire nation out there that is responsible. It is not true, this rhetoric about civilians who were not aware and not involved. It is absolutely not true.”
Herzog claims that this has been taken out of context because he later said Israel was not targeting civilians (which multiple humanitarian, legal and genocide groups and scholars have found not to be true, let alone what people are seeing with their own eyes from Palestinians reflecting their reality). You can read the whole UN report here (and I recommend you do, if you haven’t) with one of the findings:
On incitement to genocide, the Commission concludes that Israeli President Isaac Herzog, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and then Defence Minister Yoav Gallant, have incited the commission of genocide and that Israeli authorities have failed to take action against them to punish this The Commission has not fully assessed statements by other Israeli political and military leaders, including Minister for National Security Itamar Ben-Gvir and Minister for Finance Bezalel Smotrich, and considers that they too should be assessed to determine whether they constitute incitement to commit genocide.
There is not an arrest warrant out for Herzog, unlike Netanyahu, but Chris Sidoti a former Australian Human Rights Commissioner, current UN commissioner on the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory and Israel, says Australia has obligations to human rights it is not meeting in going ahead with this visit.
You can hear Sidoti talk more about that, here.
There are a handful of NSW state Labor backbenchers who have spoken out against the visit, as well as federal Labor MP Ed Husic, but other than that, despite many MPs expressing private discomfort with the visit, the Labor caucus has been pretty much silent on all of it.
An excellent primer on how this visit marks a change in how the Albanese government has been handling Israeli-Australian relations since the horrendous Bondi terrorist attack, can be found from Laura Tingle, here.
Protests are planned, while Queensland has announced it will be the first jurisdiction to ban the phrase “from the river to the sea” under the new hate speech laws, while “globalise the intifada” has already been earmarked for banning by NSW. What this means is, anyone using these phrases at a protest can be charged under the new hate speech laws. Given how frequent both these phrases are used in protesting for Palestinian liberation (many Israeli organisations and supporters interpret the phrases as meaning the destruction of Jewish people, while anti-genocide protesters and historians speak on the more nuanced history of the phrases, which includes liberation and freedom for Palestinians living under oppression and for Palestine, while pointing out intifada is Arabic for ‘shaking off’ or ‘uprising’ and protesting for freedom is a human right) deeming the phrases hate speech lends itself to concerns Australia will follow the UK’s path with mass arrests.
Given this is a visit that was supposed to help Australia heal and promote social cohesion, it’s shaping up to create one of the biggest flashpoints for the nation – and none of the politicians responsible for the visit seem to be able to answer how they will handle that, or how indeed it is going to achieve the aims of either healing, or social cohesion.
We’ll bring you more on that as well as everything else happening in the parliament and beyond.
Oh, and the Coalition officially got back together. If you care about that, you might actually be reading the wrong blog, because we try to focus on actual issues of substance here. (That is not to say that we won’t be covering it, because the ridiculousness needs to be noted for history, but honestly – it means nothing, matters nothing, and changes nothing.)
So you have me, a slightly cranky and over it Amy Remeikis, expert contributors and access to Mike Bowers, which is probably the highlight, let’s be honest, taking you through the day.
Coffee number three is already on and I will be having cake for breakfast. It is one of those days.
Ready?
Let’s get into it.
Comments (2)
-
Fiona
Mon, 09.02.26
07.57 AEDT

Israeli president lands in Australia live.thepoint.com.au
-
Andrew Faith
Mon, 09.02.26
07.33 AEDT
Join the conversation
https://live.thepoint.com.au/2026/02/the-point-live-mass-protests-planned-in-response-to-israeli-president-visit-codependent-coalition-back-together/?post=edff84fd37
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
And it's raining in Sydney today, which just makes everything so. much. better! On with the show!
Oh, good morning Amy - the cake better have been chocolate.