Strained interpretations of Nazi symbols and “hate speech” laws shut down cafes, get art taken down
Strained interpretations of Nazi symbols and “hate speech” laws shut down cafes, get art taken down
Artist Nordacious (James Hillier) is known for his irreverent art – often satirising politicians and public figures like Donald Trump, Anthony Albanese and Angus Taylor, sometimes celebrating activists, bureaucrats and cultural figures.
He’s also the only person I’m aware of who turned the Royal Commission into Robodebt into art: celebrating Centrelink employee Jeannie-Marie Blake whose early warnings about the illegal Morrison Government scheme were dismissed by senior public servants.

As Amy reported on the live blog earlier today, Nordacious has been targeted under the new Queensland laws that ban saying “from the river to the sea” or “globalise the intifada”. The police didn’t feel the need to specify which were the offending artworks, but the best guess is his artwork depicting the arrest of an activist wearing a singlet with the phrase.
Have the police correctly interpreted the law?
I doubt it, but they don’t need to be right to shut down the speech.
Nordacious has taken down the artwork, and a couple of related ones, as a precautionary measure. Of course he would – when the offence could send someone to jail for creating art, artists are going to err on the side of caution.
It’s not the first time that police have been over-zealous in enforcing “hate speech” laws.
Here in Canberra, Dissent Café was raided and temporarily shut down for satirical posters depicting Elon Musk, Donald Trump, Benjamin Netanyahu and other public figures photoshopped as Nazis, under the slogan “The Turd Reich” – on the basis that they breached laws against displaying Nazi symbols.
A week later, police dropped the case and returned the posters – having drawn far more attention to them than if they had understood the law and respected free speech.
Last year, a Wagga Wagga shop owner was charged under the state’s Nazi symbols laws for displaying posters “depicting Coalition politicians and Australian billionaires as German World War II soldiers”.
Indiscriminately conflating modern politicians and billionaires with actual Nazis risks trivialising the Holocaust and other Nazi atrocities. And if the accusation of “Nazi” is thrown around lightly, people will become numb to warnings about the real and ongoing risk of fascism.
But, to be clear, criticising someone by comparing them to the Nazis is not pro-Nazi, and it is absurd that laws intended to quash neo-Nazis are being used to shut down anti-fascist displays.
The Australia Institute warned about overreach when Nazi symbol laws were being debated three years ago, with Postdoc Fellow Benjamin Walters writing:
how do we get the balance right to ensure that only those displaying Nazi symbols in bad faith are committing an offence? … We must also consider their use in anti-fascist protest – photoshopping a Nazi armband onto a picture of a politician may appear in poor taste to some, but this sort of political action should not be conflated with pro-white supremacist political action and should certainly not warrant a prison sentence.
These types of public presentations are important to maintain as lawful displays and must be protected from government overreach.
Instead of heeding the warning, politicians rushed to legislate and police have rushed to censor – with chilling effects on free speech, harassment of artists and local businesses, and wasted police time and resources.










Comments
Start the conversation