Don't believe the lies - taxes paid by mining companies could not fund Medicare
Don’t believe the lies – taxes paid by mining companies could not fund Medicare
We’ve been writing about how Rio Tinto and BHP’s lobbyists are misleading on tax claims.
A deeper dig into the claim shows that the MCA is conflating “tax and royalties.” The physical ads only refer to “tax,” while the online claim is extended to “tax and royalties”.
This is important because royalties and taxes are different.
Taxes go to the Commonwealth and can fund programs like Medicare. Royalties are paid to state governments as payment for extracting publicly owned resources. They are not taxes – they’re more like input costs (see this Fact Check for an excellent explanation).
And they don’t fund Medicare.
But even if you include royalties, the picture doesn’t improve much. State governments spent around $586 billion on health over the decade from 2015-2024 – far exceeding the roughly $167 billion collected in mining royalties.

The mining industry is a significant taxpayer. But the claim that it could fund Medicare on its own doesn’t hold up. It relies on selective years, blurred definitions, and a misunderstanding of how Australia’s tax and health systems work.
In policy debates, details matter.

Comments
Start the conversation